Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Your arguments should be based on freedom



A little while ago before the RFRA blew up, I was crucifying some people because they were against gay marriage, and I’ve seen many arguments about the bill on both sides, but most of it doesn’t really seem relevant.

Let’s start with why we should support gay marriage.  It begins with the right of free association, but I don't mean in the constitutional sense.  The Constitution could never contain a list of all human rights, so I do not use it as a basis for whether something is a right or not a right.  At best, the Constitution is a good start.  I mean in the literal sense, who we, as people, associate with.  Everyone gets to decide who they want to associate with.  Furthermore, we get to decide the nature of the association, such as if we want to be friends or not friends, if we want to be married or not married.  Some people may argue that certain things that people believe are rights are really privileges.  The reason the argument for privilege and against a right isn’t valid in this case is because the freedom of association is derived from the freedom from aggression.   As long as you aren’t acting with unwelcome force on a person, then you are within your rights to perform that action.  When we choose the nature of association with a person to be a marriage association, same or opposite sex, we are not acting with force against anyone, therefore we have the right to that marriage.  If your religion requires you to oppose gay marriage, then you are free to choose those associations for yourself, and gay individuals are free to choose their associations for themselves.  If you petition the government to ban gay marriage, you are asking the government (the ones with the fines, jails, and guns) to act with unwelcome force on gay people.  And don’t try to hide discriminatory belief behind democracy, as a vote for a politician that forces their views on people, denying their right to free association, is your responsibility.  You’re ultimately guilty.

Now that we’ve established why urging your government to discriminate against gay people is despicable, let’s move on to whether people (such as the religious) should be allowed to discriminate.  If we go back and ask our friendly neighborhood right to freedom of association, much to the dismay of the wonderful activists who were on the freedom of association bandwagon just a moment ago, we get the same answer, and that is that you have the right to associate with or refuse association with anyone.  You can base your decision on some rational things like are they kind, ethical, or skilled, or you can base your decision on things that shouldn’t matter, like sexuality, skin color, or religion.  Let’s be clear, if you do base your decisions on things that shouldn’t matter like a person’s sexuality, skin color, and religion, then you are an a-hole.  You are 100% a dick.  No, you cannot discriminate with love.  The whole love the sinner, hate the sin thing is used way too much to hide discrimination.  If you preach this and you support gay marriage bans, then you have failed to love the sinner.  You are free to be as much of an a-hole as you like, though, until you cross the aggression line.  After that, the government can act to protect a victim’s right of freedom from aggression, but until that happens, the government must refrain from interfering or else the government itself violates our right to freedom from aggression.  If you are petitioning the government to ban individuals from discriminating, then you are asking the government to use unwelcome force in order to deny individuals their right to freely associate, which is also a dick move.  As much as I would like to sit around and only bash anti-gay people all day until my ally status reaches infinite proportions, we cannot do this.  Our enemies will latch onto this hypocrisy, and it ultimately damages our cause.  We have to be right all of the time.  If we want to freely associate, we have to tolerate others to freely associate.

Long story short version.  You can discriminate, but if you do then we, as individuals, will boycott you and your business.  The government cannot discriminate.  The government, however, must protect your right as an individual to discriminate (or to not discriminate).  If it doesn’t protect our right to discriminate, then we all are denied our right of freedom of association.  All human rights depend on the right of freedom of association.  We must tolerate the discrimination from individuals to ensure that we are tolerated by government.

To make an even longer story short, government tolerance of discrimination at the citizen level is necessary to assure civil rights for all.